Skip to Main Content

For Faculty

Emerson Syllabus Resources

The Center for Innovation in Teaching & Learning maintains a number of Emerson-specific resources for the creation of course syllabi. Additionally, on this page you'll find information on classroom best-practices and Teaching for Diversity & Inclusion. The materials included in this guide are intended to supplement materials available via the CITL website.

Implementing an Anti-Racist Syllabus

In November 2020, Hossna Sadat Ahadi and Luis A. Guerrero, both of Palomar College, submitted an article to the Academic Senate for California Community Colleges. Their article begins: "The reality today is that black indigenous people of color (BIPOC) are finding themselves having to lead anti-racism conversations and actions to change their institutions. Simply having white allies and college administration holding town-halls and meetings and listening to the BIPOC community is no longer enough. Academic institutions should all have a call to action to address racial inequities and to be accountable to meet the transformational change that society needs."

In order to "engender discussion and consideration," Ahadi and Guerrero also include a list of reflection questions to guide faculty interested in implementing antiracist pedagogy and creating course syllabi within a "decolonized and anti-racist framework." The following questions are drawn directly from their statement.

To reconstruct a course syllabus within a decolonized and anti-racist framework, faculty should reflect upon the following:

  • Do students know who you are? Consider introducing yourself—race or ethnicity, gender pronouns, academic experience, cultural identity, etc.—as the instructor of the course and providing anti-racist and equity-minded messaging to welcome your students.
  • Can students contact you through multiple methods and with flexibility in communication times?
  • What books, articles, and readings have been selected in your course? Are your course resources inclusive to race, socio-economic standing, gender, sexuality, disability, immigration status, English language learner, and first-generation students?
  • Do students have input in shaping content and co-creating community rules outlined in the course syllabus?
  • Does the syllabus include explicit language about the intolerance of microaggressions and racist remarks, action, and behavior in the course?
  • Allocating points can cause students to assume they have no room for growth, and therefore they may drop out of the course (Rose, 2017). Faculty may consider holistic modalities and progression steps—for example, beginning, emerging, and proficiency—to develop opportunities for the learner to grow (Feldman, 2019) before finalizing student grading in the class.
  • Are mistakes expected, respected, and used to elevate students’ understanding of the subject? Do you offer opportunities for retaking missed or late work? What opportunities do students have to catch up if they are behind due to technological barriers or other personal deterrents?
  • Is language around policies and expectations of students supportive and not punitive or deficit thinking (Valencia, 2010)?
  • Does your course syllabus provide information regarding housing and food insecurities, along with other on and off campus resources that benefits economically disadvantaged students?
  • Is your course on Canvas accessible, clear, inclusive, welcoming, and supportive for all learners to follow despite the modality of asynchronous or synchronous teaching?
  • Do you include messaging regarding your responsibility as a faculty member to alert learners early if participation, learning, and attendance are not met?
  • Do your course syllabus and Canvas site include positive messages and affirmations to further validate and provide a greater sense of belonging for BIPOC students in the course? Do the images and videos in the course showcase diversity and representation of the students?

Textbook Selection

Altman, William S., Kristen Ericksen, and Judith B. Pena-Shaff. "An Inclusive Process for Departmental Textbook Selection."

Teaching of Psychology 33, no. 4 (January 1, 2006): 228–31.

Abstract: This article reports on the development and use of an inclusive process to select a departmental textbook for general psychology. It describes a method for developing department-specific instruments to narrow the available textbook choices and an in-class textbook trial used in the final selection. Reported advantages of this method include "buy-in" by faculty, student evaluation of the books and ancillary materials, and classroom testing. We also provide several recommendations to assist other departments in employing our rubric.

Syllabus Statements

We encourage you to consider writing your own Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion statement for your syllabi or course policies. Anecdotally, we know that students see boiler-plate syllabus language as window-dressing, rather than identifying it as an intentional commitment on the part of faculty to be transparent and accountable. By adapting boilerplate language to the specifics of your course and outcomes, and reminding students of that connection throughout the semester, we make such statements meaningful for our students.

Anti-racist Classroom Rubric

This rubric for creating an anti-racist classroom environment was created by Cole M. James for the Otis College of Art and Design in Los Angeles, CA. 

Link: https://otis.libguides.com/tlc/anti_racist_rubric

A rubric for creating anti-racist classroom environments. Part one focuses on classroom management, reflections, and student interactions, and allows faculty to map their practices to four levels of anti-racist classroom techniques, with 1 being the highest and 4 the lowest.

A rubric for creating anti-racist classroom environments. Part two focuses on collaboration & engagement, lessons, and curriculum design, and allows faculty to map their practices to four levels of anti-racist classroom techniques, with 1 being the highest and 4 the lowest.

Universal Design Resources

UDL for Equity

CUE Syllabus Review Tool

Designed by the Center for Urban Education (CUE), the "online syllabus review guide is intended to help instructors review often taken-for-granted syllabi content through a race-conscious lens and identify areas that can be leveraged to better support students from minoritized racial/ethnic groups." The Syllabus Review tool "is an inquiry tool for promoting racial and ethnic equity and equity-minded practice." 

The Syllabus Review Guide includes five self-paced learning sections. These sections promote faculty inquiry into teaching approaches and practices, by asking faculty to engage in self-assessment from a racial/ethnic equity lens. This self-assessment is intended to help faculty consider changes that result in more equitable teaching approaches.

Description drawn from "How does Syllabus Review work?, CUE Syllabus Review Tool.

Link: http://cue-equitytools.usc.edu/

Peralta Online Equity Rubric

The Peralta Equity Rubric is a research-based course (re)design evaluation instrument to help teachers make online course experiences more equitable for all students. The rubric’s criteria include: addressing students’ access to technology and different types of support (both academic and non-academic); increasing the visibility of the instructor’s commitment to inclusion; addressing common forms of bias (e.g., implicit bias, image and representation bias, interaction bias); helping students make connections (e.g., between course topics and their lives; with the other students); and following universal design for learning principles.

The Peralta Equity Team periodically reviews and revises the rubric to address feedback and updates to equity-related research. The current rubric was launched in October 2020.